This post is the first in a series of reflections on our current grading system where I try to tackle these questions: Is the current system fair and relevant? What is the relationship between grading and learning? What alternatives to the 100 point system do educators have? Throughout the series, you will hear from other classroom teachers, my current students, and researchers who have delved into these questions with a scientific lens. In the final post, I will share what I plan to do in my own classroom as a result of these conversations and reflections.
I invite you to view this series as a conversation. One where I invite divergent perspectives, welcome respectful disagreement, and applaud any who dare to share their own struggles, resources, and triumphs with this issue. Please add your voice to the comments. My final post is not yet complete because I am waiting to see what I learn from publishing these initial posts. Perhaps you will be crucial in my final decision! I welcome you to learn and struggle through this with me. My journey begins with a conversation within my own department this past January.
The Gaming of Grading
Our high school English department was discussing whether to change the basement grade from a 50% to a 40%. Was it fair for students to even have a 40% in the grade book if they turned in 0% of their assignments? What about the students who would intentionally game the system by slacking off in the first half of the year only to kick it in high gear in the second half and pass?
Then someone clarified the basement grade’s original intent: to keep a student from “giving up altogether” after a disastrous first marking period grade. But my view? We are kidding ourselves to think this discussion is about student motivation. Also, I’m starting to feel that basement grades are just one way to duct-tape an outdated grading system.
What we are actually discussing in this meeting are the counter-moves in an elaborate game called the 100 point grading scale. By playing this game, an “us vs. them” mentality overshadows this discussion: us, the teachers vs. them, the students. Us, the teachers trying to promote learning; them, the students trying to game the system. But, who created that system in the first place? Certainly not the students. They are merely responding to the rules, looking for the loopholes, and working for the carrots. We, the teachers are trying to close the loopholes, work within the rules, still emphasize learning through it all.
Couldn’t we just reject the “Us vs. Them” system?
In the current debate between 40% or 50% for a basement grade, I don’t feel we are scratching the surface of “fairness” or equity. If a student was so disengaged that he/she didn’t complete any assignments in nine weeks, than receiving a 40% charity bump will NOT address the real issues of that student’s learning success. We need to have the more challenging discussion of how we–the teachers and the system–should be reaching this student. Yet, we were asked by our administration and colleagues to have a basement grade discussion, so we did. We discussed our preference of 40% or 50%, found consensus, and then moved onto the next agenda item.
But I was left unsettled.
Who else feels the grading system is broken?
The very next day, an article by anti-grade revolutionary Mark Barnes caught my eye: How Eliminating Grades Changed Everything in my Classroom. Barnes writes: “Grades are just a math game…If you know how to work the numbers, you can get a good grade.” He goes on to detail how he felt by the end of that year: “I wasn’t teaching students anything, except failure or, worse, how to manipulate traditional grades enough to build report cards that would be acceptable at home.”
So he decided to eliminate the traditional grading system in his classroom. In its place, Barnes provided his students with ungraded feedback as well as challenging questions. He asked students to self-assess and take ownership over their own learning journey.
Upon reading this short post, my feelings of being unsettled distilled into a restlessness for action. I too felt that our current grading system was broken, but what was I going to do about it? I started asking myself tough questions like: what did I believe was the purpose of grades? Could I help my students by taking a risk to try a different system of accountability and assessment?
I shared Barnes’ post on my Facebook feed. Almost immediately teachers and parents in my network began responding. A few wanted to get rid of grading altogether while others admitted that this issue was also a “struggle” for them in their classrooms. We all seemed to sense that something was deeply wrong about our current grading system, but also weren’t sure the alternatives. So many teachers seemed eager for this conversation. And so many have already begun to challenge the status quo.
A comment I wrote on Barnes’ original post was shared by an EdWeek Teacher editor on Twitter. You can see how many times it was retweeted. Not Lady Gaga numbers, but for an educational tweet, still indicative that this idea strikes a nerve with educators and parents.
Restlessness to Action
Our grading system seems up for review. Teachers care about learning and about students meeting their potential; teachers are worried about the lack of joy and the proliferation of stress in our schools today. These teachers are ready to have a conversation beyond duct-tape options. We are ready to reexamine the system, look at the research, and have that bigger discussion of fairness and equity.
Two teachers who have agreed to walk this journey with me are linked below.
Sandy Mertz: Jesse Pinkman’s Wooden Box
David Cohen: Don’t Give a Pass to Failed Grading Systems
In my next post, I’ll share with you the responses from my students when I asked them about their relationship with the grading system. Until then, I invite you to share your own perspective on our current system. Does it seem to be working for the students in your classroom? Do you feel that it is a fair assessment of student learning? What have you done to manipulate the system to create fairness?
For the next post in this series, click the following link: Grading: A Duct-Taped System? Students Weigh In.
This post was edited 12:00PM Friday, 2/27/2015 to reflect David Cohen’s updated blog link in this conversation.
This post was edited 12:00PM Thursday, 3/4/2015 to include the link to the second post in the series and modify the end teaser to reflect that post’s content.