One of my favorite parts about attending a conference like #ISTE2014 is having the chance to think deeply with brilliant peers. Every conversation that I had — whether it took place in a diner, outside the Expo hall, in the backchannel of a session, or on a walk back to the condo that I shared with Philip Cummings and John Spencer — was a chance to wrestle with teaching and learning in today’s world.
What I loved the best, though, was working to share those conversations through Twitter.
Because Twitter is an intentionally restricted medium built on short messages, giving others a summary of the learning that I was doing required me to clarify and polish and condense the fundamental notions running through my head. The results, I think, are clear and simple statements of my core beliefs.
Here are five of those statements that still have me thinking:
One of the things that I liked the LEAST about ISTE was listening to people tell me about their favorite digital tools simply because MOST of those conversations overlooked the simple truth that technology alone isn’t a motivator for kids:
I don’t look for technology that motivates kids. I look for learning opportunities that motivate kids. That’s not the same thing. #ISTE2014 — Bill Ferriter (@plugusin) June 29, 2014
On a similar note, I started thinking a lot about the kinds of people that we look to for leadership in today’s digital world. Often, we celebrate the Techie, thinking that any person with a backpack full of digital tools HAS to know what matters in today’s classroom. The simple truth is that I’d take a teaching geek over a tech geek any day:
An #ISTE2014 reminder for you: The people driving change with digital tools aren’t tech geeks. They are teaching geeks. — Bill Ferriter (@plugusin) July 1, 2014
Walking through the Expo Hall at ISTE is — in many ways — a frightening experience. You are surrounded by hundreds of companies peddling their products, working to convince you that their features would revolutionize education. What frustrated me was that 90% of the crap on display did nothing to give kids the chance to learn about, participate in, or improve the world around them:
The only feature that I am looking for in an #edtech tool is whether or not it makes it possible for kids to change the world. #ISTE2014 — Bill Ferriter (@plugusin) June 29, 2014
Early on in my ISTE experience, I spent an hour or so sitting in a Commons Area with 10 or 15 other attendees. During the entire time, NO ONE had a conversation. Instead, they stared into screens, Tweeting or texting or Voxing or blogging or Instagramming. That worried me:
Don’t forget that the person sitting at the table with you is as interesting as the person on the other side of this screen. #ISTE2014 — Bill Ferriter (@plugusin) June 28, 2014
If we aren’t talking about kids first and tech second, we’re wasting our time — and probably our district’s cash. But I’m still shocked at how easy it is to get wrapped up in conversations about gadgets — especially when we are at a conference where people brag about being techies and gear heads and gadget freaks:
Here’s an #ISTE2014 reflection question for you: Did you spend more time talking about #edtech yesterday than you did talking about kids? — Bill Ferriter (@plugusin) June 30, 2014
Any of this resonate with you? What did ISTE leave you wondering about?
—————————-
Related Radical Reads:
The Gadget Happy Classroom Fail
Share this post:
Author
Related Posts
September 13, 2021
Pause, ponder, then plan:
Cultivating Communities of Impact
February 23, 2021